Are The Felon’s Most Recent Pardons Constitutional?

Can he pardon those complicit in a crime in which he himself was complicit?

I am not a lawyer and I do, occasionally, get caught up in trying to decipher how legal decisions make sense in the real world but this one got to me immediately. Here’s how an AI search defined SCOTUS’ decision on presidential immunity:

Trump v. United States decision in July 2024, the Supreme Court ruled that presidents have absolute immunity for official acts related to their “core constitutional powers” and a presumption of immunity for other official acts. A president has no immunity for unofficial acts. This means a former president cannot be prosecuted for actions falling under their core constitutional duties, but they can be prosecuted for acts that are not official. The decision’s framework, which distinguishes between “core constitutional powers,” “outer perimeter” official acts, and “unofficial” acts, requires lower courts to determine the scope of immunity on a case-by-case basis.”

You get that?  “Absolute Immunity” for official acts related to “core constitutional powers” (all italics are my emphasis). 

Presumptive Immunity” for “other official acts”. Presumptive immunity applies to actions that are “within the outer perimeter of his official responsibility” and can be overcome by the government if it can prove that a prosecution would pose “no dangers of intrusion on the authority and functions of the Executive Branch”. 

The Fat Felon pardoned Rudy Giuliani and Mark Meadows, both of whom were/are implicated in the crime of trying to overturn a legal, fair, federal election, and there are many, many more.  We all watched as the Felon initiated the entire event from the very beginning where he called it a fraudulent election from the moment Biden was declared the victor, to his speech in the park where he told an already angry crowd to march on the Capitol.  His complicity is impossible to ignore, and it is the overt and public commission of a crime. He was directing the actions of those individuals – a mob, actually – that joined him in overturning a free, fair and legal election.  Can he now turn around and pardon those complicit in a criminal undertaking in which he himself was the leader?  This seems circular in logic and a completely irrational use of the law.

What do you think?

TACO? How About DACO?

Long Before Trump “Chickened-Out” the Democrats Showed Him How It’s Done!

It’s hard to overstate the position the Dumo’s had the Repugs in during this shutdown.  Even the Fat Felon admitted that the shutdown was being blamed on the Repugs, it was pounding his favorability ratings into the ground (37%) and, even more impressive, the American people were cheering them on!  Actually cheering for the Dumos seemingly granite-like resolve and their determination to see this fight out to the end!  Can you imagine?  Yeah, me neither.

However, to give them the benefit of the doubt, they really were chugging along there for a while. They really seemed to be determined to see this one out; to hold the Repug’s feet to the fire in order to get the ACA subsidies back so Americans can afford their healthcare. Except I could feel it coming; sense the tension that I know the Dumos just cannot handle and, finally, they didn’t; Democrats Always Chicken Out!  

Well, this was the last line in the sand for me; I am finished supporting – both practically and financially – the Milquetoast Party!  Schumer should step aside, in fact, he should resign, along with many other so-called “moderate” Dumos. Their spineless, hapless nature has been proved time and again and we just aren’t going to get anywhere with them at the helm. We need progressives, real progressives, that are willing to go beyond the pale to make things happen; good things, new laws and protections, new economic programs, for the American people.

Democrats: Stop calling me, texting me, emailing me.  We have no use for you any longer

Donald:  Wake Up & Smell the Democracy!

It only took ten months for America to tire of this hyperactive man-baby!

Wow! That was fast, wasn’t it?  It took less than ten months for America to see through the lies, false promises, and subterfuge of Donald Trump and decide he just isn’t worth it!  Although I think we can count on a much more robust attack on our elections for the next 12 months (he’s already been saying the California vote was fraudulent even before the first ballot was cast!), at the very least this election demonstrates that America isn’t going to take this lying down. She is out on the streets, protesting, writing letters, calling Congressional representatives, and canvassing for votes in her neighborhoods!  America is on democracy fire

I, for one, am much pleased to see that as a nation we are now so politically motivated as to actually go out and vote – and in record numbers – during an off-year election. Sure, there are still considerable numbers of people that continued to vote for him and his repulsive ilk, Vance, Miller, Noem, and the rest of the dirt bags that presently comprise his administration, and, to be sure, it is disturbing on a number of levels, notably how acceptable it is to some to watch their neighbors being snatched off the streets. Fortunately for America, it isn’t acceptable to a majority – and a good majority at that – of Americans and they’ve just said as much at the top of their lungs!

Next stop: the mid-term elections of next November!  I know that we say every election is a matter of life and death, but this one truly is, a matter of life and death of democracy!  The election held yesterday is an excellent sign to be sure, however it doesn’t do anything that’ll put the ka-bosch on anything the Felon is doing presently. We need a robust majority in Congress to do what America so desperately needs; throw the Fat Felon out of office and into a court room where he can be tried for his many crimes, many committed while he is in office. 

Of course, eventually Mike Johnson will need to swear in newly elected Congresswoman Adelita Grijalva so we can demand the release of the Epstein files and discover what we already know.  If nothing else it’ll be interesting to watch the evangelical and fundamentalist phonies try and justify his “innocence” and their continued support of him.  

I can hardly wait!

The Fat Felon Pardons Another Fat Felon

Did anyone ever really doubt it? Fat Orange Jesus never met a felon he didn’t like!

The Fat, 36-time convicted Felon in the White House commented the sentence of the 2nd most mendacious, 2nd fattest, criminal of current political time, George Santos, if that is really his name! After all, we’ve heard so much about his antics, cross-dressing, latin name, English name, Jewish, Gentile, whatever. Is there anyone that is surprised buy this? I’m guessing Santos was present at some of the Epstein parties President Draft Dodger attended?

Seems likely?

Deepest Condolences to the Kirks

It should not be tolerable for a civilized people to endure violence against anyone for their beliefs.

Say what you want about Charlie Kirk; he was right, he was wrong, he was crazy, he was entirely sane. I don’t think he ever said anything that hadn’t been said previously by any number of conservative voices. They are the opinions of many millions of people in this country; whether you like it no not, and it is nothing new. What, then, could possibly come of this senseless act? What good could possibly come of this murderous act?

None. There is no good that could come from this barbarous act. It should be condemned by all. Our hearts go out to the family of Charlie, our deepest sympathies to the family of the Kirks.

A Review of “Defending Child Sacrifice: The Ultimate Expression of Cultural Relativism”

Last week on ‘carljohnsonsite’ a couple of Christian propagandists assert the teaching of child sacrifice in Colorado schools.

Christians have asserted some incredibly crackpot things in the media (think: Donald Trump was sent by Jesus!) and, apparently, continue to do so including their new, wildly insane claim of a defense of child sacrifice being taught in Colorado schools. Add this to their accusations of persecution around the world which are also completely laughable considering that, throughout history, no organization or religion persecuted more people – entire nations and societies at a time – than Christians.  In fact, they literally perfected the art of persecution since there was so little of it before Christianity became an “accepted” then the “official” religion within the Roman Empire.  And they did so in spectacular ways; burning, hanging, the “rack”, ripping off fingernails and body parts, extravagant torture chambers, and much more. They really put their best and most creative foot forward when it came to torture; all to force people to believe what they believe.  You see, it’s not enough for them to hold their mindless, vacuous, beliefs regardless of how ridiculous they are, you must believe it also whether you want to or not. This is the Christian way. So much for “free will” I guess. 

Now they’re going off on child sacrifice in the ancient world and asserting that our children are being taught that child sacrifice shouldn’t be necessarily held as “wrong” (the Inca civilization was the example sited).  They claim the unnamed teacher “also reprimanded ‘white education’ for wrongly teaching generations of Americans that the practice was bad. I’m not making this up.”  First, let’s say that there is a really good chance that they have, in fact, made this up since the weaving of absolute nonsense is one of their specialties.  Let’s also note that they just love an issue that calls out white America so they can demonstrate all the “woe is me” trials and tribulations (pun intended) of the poor, abused, white man. But perhaps their most zany claim is that the remedy for child sacrifice in the ancient world was, of course, Christianity because, after all, who else protects the innocent children of the world more than Jesus’ pious and god-fearing faithful?  It is this claim specifically that got me off the couch to refute this hypocritical, self-righteous nonsense.  But I’ll get to that in a bit.

Let’s remember that, first, they believe that there’s an invisible man in the sky that knows everything, everything you think – or have ever thought – everything you’ve done or will ever do; all monitored by an invisible, supernatural entity. They believe that virgins can have babies while remaining virgins, that people (men, almost exclusively) can perform miracles including walking on water, turning water into wine, raising the dead and, best of all, dying and returning to life – physically – all because some people (again, men exclusively) wrote it in an ancient scroll. Imagine, an ancient society thinking such things!  Remember that all the other religions with the equally ridiculous claims were all deemed false by Christians, except this one!

But my favorite point of the entire episode is their pearl-clutching objection to the idea of child sacrifice in the ancient world.  This seems to step right over the fact that the Israelites themselves also practiced child sacrifice in their very early development as a “people”. (See “Child Sacrifice in Ancient Israel” by Heath D. Dewrell) This was not unusual or considered primitive for hundreds and hundreds of years.  Beyond this, their assertion also steps over the steaming pile of excrement that their very own religion relies completely on human sacrifice.  There would be no Christianity (or, at least, no theological basis for it) if it weren’t for their claim that a man named Yeshua – a devout Jew, who lived his entire life as a Jew, born raised and supposedly died as a Jew – returned to life after a most grisly execution by scourging and then crucifixion by the Roman procurator Pontius Pilate.  Salvation within the Christian mythology is literally based-upon and completely dependent upon his role as the person of honor in a vicarious human sacrificial ceremony!  This is direct contrast to Hebrew Scripture which states unequivocally that no person may pay for the sins of others, it is simply not acceptable to the deity; the sinner must pay for their own sins.  However, they would have you believe that in this one case, it became not only permissible but essential; that this completely innocent person (literally born without sin) die for the sins of others.  In other words, vicarious salvation by the human sacrifice of another, innocent person.

As far as their assertion that it was Christianity that saved the children from further sacrificial death, I believe it is essential to first understand that the practice of child sacrifice within Israel and the Near East ended millennia before Christianity was even a moronic idea in the head of Saul/Paul and the early church fathers.  It simply wasn’t even a issue discussed in almost any area of the new mythology.  But I think it’s worth noting that the fanatical support of the GOP by the delirious religious class really places their assertion about protecting children exactly where it belongs: in the circular file.  They support a party that simply will not lift a finger to protect our children in their schools, where they are killed by gunmen almost every, single day.  If this is protecting children, then they are as delirious in this intention as their mind-numbing mythology.  Even though I think of this as our most egregious violation of our duties and responsibilities as parents, adults, guardians, whatever, they’re perfectly ok with their representative’s apathy and inaction.

Additionally, I think their silent acquiescence towards the deliberate and systematic genocide by the Israel government and military further highlights the dishonesty and fallaciousness of Christian claims on this topic.  They haven’t – and won’t – say a peep about the deaths of literally thousands and thousands of innocent civilians, men, women and children.  Doesn’t sound to me as though their deity gives a hoot about anything other than money and power.  But then, that is the history of Christianity in practice.

Lastly, their newest and most laughable “messiah” Donald Trump, the THIRTY-FOUR TIME CONVICTED FELON, ADJUDICATED SEXUAL PREDATOR, and adamant PROTECTOR OF THE MOST PROLIFIC PEDOPHILE in AMERICAN HISTORY, whom, it should be noted, they overwhelmingly voted for doesn’t do much to support their case either.  Their assertion of Christianity as the protector of children, as on many of their wildly fictitious and baseless claims, is simply not substantiated by the facts.

I’ll end on my amusement that they never seem to allow comments to their most absurd articles; the ‘debate’ (at least in their own minds) of the Shroud of Turin, the “Rapture”, the return of Yeshua (any day now, after all it’s only been TWO THOUSAND years, so far), and much more cannot be refuted or commented upon.

Gee, I wonder why?